Delhi High court orders in W.P. 8434 of 2011 [ irregularity in EWS admission]

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

  [

  W.P.(C) 8434/2011



  SOCIAL JURIST ..... Petitioner

  Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Kusum Sharma, Adv.




Versus



  GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI . .... Respondent

  Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for GNCTD.

  Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI.

  CORAM:

   HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW



   O R D E R

   25.01.2012



  Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate states that affidavit shall be filed
  in the course of the day. Advance copy of the same has been handed over
  to the counsel for the petitioner who wants to file the rejoinder. The
  same be filed within one week.

  List on 29th February, 2012.

  CM No.1168/2012 and 1122/2012 (for direction).

  Notice.

  Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate accepts notice. Reply be filed within
  two weeks.

  File of W.P.(C) No. 40/2012 shall be sent to the Court on the next
  date of hearing.









  ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE





  RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J

  JANUARY 25, 2012/pp..

  ________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

  W.P.(C) 8434/2011, CM No.1168/2012 and 1122/2012 (for direction).

  SOCIAL JURIST ..... Petitioner

  Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Kusum Sharma, Advs.




versus



  GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent

  Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advs. for GNCTD.

  CORAM:

   HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW



   O R D E R

   29.02.2012



  1. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it is stated that
  District Admission Monitoring Committee has been constituted in each
  district in accordance with the provisions of the Notification dated 7th
  January, 2011 which has been issued for ensuring admission of 25%
  students belonging to Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of the Society.

  2. It is further stated that number of complaints were received and
  disposed of by the respective District Admission Monitoring Committees
  and show cause notices were issued to the schools which were not giving

  admission against EWS seats. The affidavit however lacks particulars and does not give information as to which are the erring schools and what
  kind of action is taken against those schools. This information shall be
  supplied within four weeks.

  3. Mr. Ashok Agarwal has handed over list of 10 schools which are not
  complying with the aforesaid provision. The respondent shall also take
  steps in this regard.



  4. List on 18th April, 2012.

  ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE





  RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J

  FEBRUARY 29, 2012
  ________________________________________________________________________