IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
[
W.P.(C) 8434/2011
SOCIAL JURIST ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Kusum Sharma, Adv.
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI . .... Respondent
Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. for GNCTD.
Ms. Archana Gaur, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
25.01.2012
Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate states that affidavit shall be filed
in the course of the day. Advance copy of the same has been handed over
to the counsel for the petitioner who wants to file the rejoinder. The
same be filed within one week.
List on 29th February, 2012.
CM No.1168/2012 and 1122/2012 (for direction).
Notice.
Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate accepts notice. Reply be filed within
two weeks.
File of W.P.(C) No. 40/2012 shall be sent to the Court on the next
date of hearing.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
JANUARY 25, 2012/pp..
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 8434/2011, CM No.1168/2012 and 1122/2012 (for direction).
SOCIAL JURIST ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Ms. Kusum Sharma, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advs. for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
29.02.2012
1. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, it is stated that
District Admission Monitoring Committee has been constituted in each
district in accordance with the provisions of the Notification dated 7th
January, 2011 which has been issued for ensuring admission of 25%
students belonging to Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) of the Society.
2. It is further stated that number of complaints were received and
disposed of by the respective District Admission Monitoring Committees
and show cause notices were issued to the schools which were not giving
admission against EWS seats. The affidavit however lacks particulars and does not give information as to which are the erring schools and what
kind of action is taken against those schools. This information shall be
supplied within four weeks.
3. Mr. Ashok Agarwal has handed over list of 10 schools which are not
complying with the aforesaid provision. The respondent shall also take
steps in this regard.
4. List on 18th April, 2012.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
FEBRUARY 29, 2012
________________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment