IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
27.05.2011
Present: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Addl.Standing Counsel for Govt. of
NCT of Delhi for R-3 and R-4.
Mr.Abhir Dutt, Advocate for Mr.Rajiv Bansal, counsel
for R-5.
WP (C) No.3715/2011 and CM No.7777/2011
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he confines the relief
to quashing of the subsequent notification dated 07.01.2011 if it is read as
superseding the earlier notification dated 25.01.2007. It is submitted that
only if the petitioner succeeds in this relief, the natural sequitor would
follow, as prayed for in prayer clause (a) of the writ petition.
Notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued returnable on
26.07.2011. Learned counsel for R-3 to R-5 accept notice. Learned counsel for
the petitioner at this stage states that R-1 and R-2 need not be served in view
of the confined relief.
Counter affidavit, if any, be filed by R-3 to R-5 on or before
08.07.2011. Rejoinder thereto, as prayed for, be filed within one week
thereafter.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
MAY 27, 2011 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
dm
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 3715/2011 and CM Nos.7777/2011 and 9888/2011
ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Ms.Kusum Sharma and
Mr.Khagesh Jha, Advocates.
versus
BALBHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL and ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Addl.Standing Counsel for
Govt. of NCT of Delhi for R-3 and R-4.
Mr.Subrat Deb, Advocate for R-5/DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
11.01.2012
It is 1.05 P.M.
It is not possible to conclude hearing in 10 minutes.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states they are in a part-heard
matter in the post lunch session.
List on 14.03.2012.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
JANUARY 11, 2012/dm
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 3715/2011
ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Mr. Khagesh
Jha, Advocates
versus
BAL BHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL and ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Addl. Standing Counsel,
GNCTD with Mr. Abhijeet Kakoti and Md. Arlam
Khan, Advocates for R-3 and R-4
Mr. Subrat Deb, Advocate for R-5/DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
14.03.2012
Rule DB.
Learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 5 accept notice.
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 need not to be served in view of the order
dated 27.05.2011.
At request of learned counsel for parties, the petition is taken up
for final disposal.
During the course of the hearing, it has emerged that a challenge
has been laid to the various provisions of the Right of Children to Free
and Compulsory
W.P.(C) 3715/2011 Page 1 of 2
Education Act, 2009 before the Hon?ble Supreme court. We are informed
that the judgment was reserved in August, 2011. In our considered view,
the judgment would have a direct impact on the controversy before us.
We thus consider it appropriate to have the benefit of the judgment
of the Supreme Court to take a view in this matter.
List for directions on 27.04.2012.
CM Nos.7777/2011 (for directions) and 9888/2011 (stay)
The petitioner by the interim measure seeks suspension of the
notification issued by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi dated 07.01.2011 and
revival of the notification dated 25.01.2007 which stands superseded vide
the notification dated 07.01.2011. This certainly cannot be done by an
interim measure.
Thus no interim directions can be passed in this matter.
The applications stand disposed of.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 14, 2012
yg
________________________________________________________________________
27.05.2011
Present: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Addl.Standing Counsel for Govt. of
NCT of Delhi for R-3 and R-4.
Mr.Abhir Dutt, Advocate for Mr.Rajiv Bansal, counsel
for R-5.
WP (C) No.3715/2011 and CM No.7777/2011
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he confines the relief
to quashing of the subsequent notification dated 07.01.2011 if it is read as
superseding the earlier notification dated 25.01.2007. It is submitted that
only if the petitioner succeeds in this relief, the natural sequitor would
follow, as prayed for in prayer clause (a) of the writ petition.
Notice to show cause as to why rule nisi be not issued returnable on
26.07.2011. Learned counsel for R-3 to R-5 accept notice. Learned counsel for
the petitioner at this stage states that R-1 and R-2 need not be served in view
of the confined relief.
Counter affidavit, if any, be filed by R-3 to R-5 on or before
08.07.2011. Rejoinder thereto, as prayed for, be filed within one week
thereafter.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
MAY 27, 2011 RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.
dm
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 3715/2011 and CM Nos.7777/2011 and 9888/2011
ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal, Ms.Kusum Sharma and
Mr.Khagesh Jha, Advocates.
versus
BALBHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL and ORS. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Addl.Standing Counsel for
Govt. of NCT of Delhi for R-3 and R-4.
Mr.Subrat Deb, Advocate for R-5/DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
11.01.2012
It is 1.05 P.M.
It is not possible to conclude hearing in 10 minutes.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states they are in a part-heard
matter in the post lunch session.
List on 14.03.2012.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL,J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
JANUARY 11, 2012/dm
________________________________________________________________________
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 3715/2011
ASHOK KUMAR THAKUR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Mr. Khagesh
Jha, Advocates
versus
BAL BHARATI PUBLIC SCHOOL and ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Addl. Standing Counsel,
GNCTD with Mr. Abhijeet Kakoti and Md. Arlam
Khan, Advocates for R-3 and R-4
Mr. Subrat Deb, Advocate for R-5/DDA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
14.03.2012
Rule DB.
Learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 5 accept notice.
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 need not to be served in view of the order
dated 27.05.2011.
At request of learned counsel for parties, the petition is taken up
for final disposal.
During the course of the hearing, it has emerged that a challenge
has been laid to the various provisions of the Right of Children to Free
and Compulsory
W.P.(C) 3715/2011 Page 1 of 2
Education Act, 2009 before the Hon?ble Supreme court. We are informed
that the judgment was reserved in August, 2011. In our considered view,
the judgment would have a direct impact on the controversy before us.
We thus consider it appropriate to have the benefit of the judgment
of the Supreme Court to take a view in this matter.
List for directions on 27.04.2012.
CM Nos.7777/2011 (for directions) and 9888/2011 (stay)
The petitioner by the interim measure seeks suspension of the
notification issued by the Govt. of NCT of Delhi dated 07.01.2011 and
revival of the notification dated 25.01.2007 which stands superseded vide
the notification dated 07.01.2011. This certainly cannot be done by an
interim measure.
Thus no interim directions can be passed in this matter.
The applications stand disposed of.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MARCH 14, 2012
yg
________________________________________________________________________
No comments:
Post a Comment